AKTU Challenge Evaluation 2024–25 (First Phase) Notification : We present a complete, actionable, and student-focused guide to the Challenge Evaluation (re-evaluation) process for the APJ Abdul Kalam Technical University (AKTU) SEM Semester — First Phase examinations for the 2024–25 academic session. This publication is tailored for students, affiliated college administrators, examination officers, and academic coordinators who need a reliable, step-by-step reference to the rules, timelines, procedures, and best practices surrounding viewing digitally evaluated answer-scripts and initiating challenge evaluations. The content below consolidates operational instructions, institutional responsibilities, legal references, practical tips, and templates so stakeholders can act with clarity and compliance.
What is Challenge Evaluation (Re-evaluation)? — Clear definition
Challenge Evaluation (commonly referred to as re-evaluation or rechecking) is a formal process by which a student requests the university to review the already evaluated answer-script(s). This process typically involves:
- Viewing the digitally marked answer-book to verify marks awarded and examiner comments.
- Submitting a formal challenge where the student believes a marking error, omission, or computational mistake has occurred.
- Re-assessment by an independent evaluator or panel, conducted under university-prescribed rules, which may result in marks being increased, decreased, or unchanged.
This mechanism is meant to ensure transparency and fairness in the evaluation process while preserving the integrity of examinations.
Exams covered & eligibility for the 2024–25 first-phase notification
The first-phase SEM examinations (session 2024–25) were conducted between 17 May 2025 and 13 June 2025. The university’s notification covers regular students enrolled in specific courses and semesters; examples include B.Tech, B.Pharm, B.F.A, BHMCT, B.Voc, MCA/MBA/M.Tech (Integrated) and B.Arch final/penultimate semesters as specified in the official list. Only regular students who appeared for the relevant papers are eligible to view their digital answer-sheets and apply for challenge evaluation under this notification.
Legal & policy context — government directives and university authority
Applications and procedures for viewing and challenging answer-sheets are governed by both state government directives and university regulations. For AKTU’s 2024–25 first-phase challenge evaluation:
- Refer to the Government Order No. 39298/16-1099/17/2020 (dated 11 September 2020) and associated official communications (e.g., E-7443/03-GS/2019 (TC)). These documents set out standardized guidelines for re-evaluation and student access to evaluated scripts.
- The university’s own circular (e.g., AKTU / P.Ni.Ka / 20252/189 dated 8 October 2025) provides operational details — application windows, fees, ERP procedures, and extended deadlines.
Institutions must ensure their internal processes align with these directives to maintain compliance and protect student rights.
Timelines & extension: critical dates students must note
Original notification date: 8 October 2025 (directing students to apply via ERP).
Extended final date: 26 October 2025, till 5:00 PM (extended to accommodate institutional requests). This extension is the final window for first-phase challenge evaluation applications under the cited notice — stakeholders should treat it as strict and urgent.
Fee payment and submission must be completed within this window; late submissions are typically not accepted. Following application and payment, the digital answer-sheets will be made available in the student’s ERP account for viewing, after which formal challenge submissions (if any) can be lodged according to the university’s stated timeline for post-viewing actions.
Fee structure & payment mechanism
Application fee: ₹300 per subject — payable online through the University ERP during the application step. This fee applies to each subject/paper a student wishes to view and/or challenge. Students must preserve payment receipts and ERP confirmations; these are essential for later correspondence or dispute resolution.
How to apply — step-by-step student workflow (practical)
We outline a deliberately granular workflow to eliminate ambiguity:
- Access ERP: Login to the AKTU ERP using your student credentials. If you are unable to login, contact your college exam cell immediately — do not wait until the deadline.
- Profile verification: Confirm your roll number, course, semester, email and mobile number in ERP.
- Navigate to Challenge Evaluation: Look for the “Answer-Script Viewing / Challenge Evaluation” module. University notifications usually link directly to this portal area.
- Select subjects/papers: Choose only those subjects you intend to view/challenge. Remember the fee is per subject.
- Pay online: Use the ERP payment interface to pay ₹300 per subject. Use a stable internet connection and save the transaction ID and screenshot.
- Acknowledge receipt: After payment, confirm receipt is recorded in the ERP. If not, contact the exam branch immediately.
- View digital scripts: The ERP will provide access to the scanned/digitally evaluated answer-booklets. View them carefully in an environment with reliable internet and adequate screen size.
- Submit challenge (if required): If dissatisfied, fill the re-evaluation form online, upload justification (if allowed), and submit before the final cut-off for accepting challenge requests.
- Track the application: Use ERP to monitor status (e.g., received, under review, decision made).
- Result update: Re-evaluation outcomes will be posted on ERP and reflected in updated result sheets.
Practical tips for reviewing digital answer-sheets (student checklist)
To make a strong, evidence-based challenge, students should:
- Use a large screen (desktop or tablet) to inspect annotations and examiner comments clearly.
- Compare against the question paper & marking scheme: locate where marks were awarded and check if parts of your answer were ignored.
- Document discrepancies precisely: cite question numbers, specific lines or portions, and how marks should be allocated per rubric.
- Avoid emotional/ambiguous language in the challenge — stick to factual, itemized points.
- Take screenshots for your records showing questionable markings and the timestamps if possible.
- Limit scope: challenge only papers with plausible marking errors to avoid unnecessary expense.
nstitutional responsibilities — what colleges must do
Affiliated colleges play a central role in ensuring the process is smooth:
- Communicate widely: Post notices, send bulk SMS/emails, update WhatsApp groups and noticeboards immediately.
- ERP support: Ensure students and staff are trained to navigate the ERP; provide contact points for login/payment issues.
- Maintain records: Keep institutional registers of student submissions and payment confirmations.
- Protect privacy: Ensure digital scripts are accessible only to the concerned student and authorized staff.
- Escalation channels: Provide an examination cell email/phone for unresolved ERP/payment faults and coordinate with the university examination branch.
What happens after a challenge is filed — process & possible outcomes
- The task is reassigned to a different evaluator or a committee for impartial review.
- After re-assessment, marks may increase, decrease, or remain unchanged.
- Official outcomes are notified via ERP; the university’s decision is typically final.
- If the re-evaluation changes marks, results and grade cards are updated and the student is informed accordingly.
Risk management & dispute escalation — what to do if problems arise
If you face technical hurdles, payment failures, or suspect procedural irregularities:
- Immediately document the issue: screenshots of errors, timestamps, transaction logs.
- Notify your college exam cell with supporting evidence; colleges should coordinate with the university’s exam branch.
- If unresolved, escalate through formal university grievance channels as per published protocols.
- Keep copies of all communications (emails, ERP messages, SMS) for future reference.
Model justification template — how to write a precise challenge statement
Below is a concise, evidence-based template students can use when submitting the re-evaluation request:
Subject: Challenge Evaluation Request — [Subject Code & Title]
Roll Number: [Your Roll No.] — Course & Semester: [Course, Semester]
Exam Date: [Date of Exam] — Paper Code: [Paper Code]
Grounds for challenge:
- Question [X] — Examiner awarded [Y] marks; marking does not account for [specific point, with reference to marking scheme]. Requested correction: [specify expected marks].
- Question [Z] — Part (b) not evaluated in final tally though answer present on page [N]. Requested action: reassessment for omitted section.
Supporting evidence: [List any attachments or page references from digital script]
Declaration: I confirm the above information is true to the best of my knowledge.
Signature: [Student Name & Date]
Using a standardized format helps examiners process the challenge faster and reduces ambiguity.
FAQs
- Can marks decrease after re-evaluation? Yes. Re-evaluation is a true reassessment and can reduce marks in some cases. Be cognizant of this risk.
- Is the fee refundable? Generally not. Check university policy for exceptions.
- Will re-evaluation delay final results? Re-evaluations are processed alongside result finalization; individual delays may occur but the university will publish timelines.
- Can I withdraw my application after paying? Policies differ; check the ERP or university circular. Typically, withdrawals may not be permitted once re-assessment begins.
Accessibility & fairness considerations
Universities must ensure the process is accessible (ERP portals are usable on various devices, with clear instructions) and fair (timely response, transparent outcomes). Students with disabilities must be supported through alternate access provisions if needed — colleges should provide assistance and make formal requests on behalf of such students.
Best practices for administrators — reduce friction and student anxiety
- Proactive communication: Use multiple channels and send reminders before the deadline.
- Dry-run support sessions: Host short workshops or help-desks showing how to use the ERP module.
- Centralized logging: Keep a local backup of student submissions and receipts in case ERP confirmations are delayed.
- Timely FAQs: Publish an FAQ bulletin addressing likely student questions to minimize individual queries.
Final checklist — students & institutions (quick reference)
For students:
- ERP login validated and profile updated.
- Identify target subjects and confirm eligibility.
- Pay ₹300 per subject via ERP and save proof.
- View digital scripts on ERP; prepare itemized challenge notes.
- Submit challenge before 26 Oct 2025, 5:00 PM (final extended deadline).
For institutions:
- Communicate extended deadline and assist students.
- Ensure payment gateway and ERP functionality.
- Provide escalation contacts and log student interactions.
- Maintain confidentiality and data security.
Conclusion
We urge all eligible students and affiliated institutions to act promptly and deliberately to make use of the Challenge Evaluation facility for the AKTU 2024–25 first-phase examinations. The final extended deadline — 26 October 2025, 5:00 PM — demands swift action: verify ERP accessibility, complete payment, view the digitally evaluated scripts thoroughly, and file any justified challenges with clear evidence. Institutions should proactively support their students with ERP assistance, documentation, and communication so that the re-evaluation process runs smoothly, fairly, and within prescribed legal and administrative guidelines.
Act now — missing the deadline may forfeit the right to first-phase challenge evaluation for the covered examinations.